-
IBPS CNRS-UPMC UMR7622 October 23, 2019 at 11:00 am
Hi,
I run this short protocol (see below) using a Zeiss CZI stack , three channels about 1 GB (Icy memory 15000 MB). With ICY version 1.9 this protocol work very well in few seconds while with version 2.0.2 this protocol block on step 4 intensity properties (I tried with virtual dub ON/off).
Do you know where is the problem?
Thank for your help.
Best regards.
Michel
IBPS CNRS-UPMC UMR7622 October 23, 2019 at 11:06 amSorry, I forgot, It takes > 11 minutes to complete version 2.0.2.
Michel
Stephane Dallongeville October 24, 2019 at 10:00 amHi Michel,
Indeed we were able to reproduce it and the speed difference is huge to say the least !
We will investigate and try to fix that asap (probably related to the intensity projection plugin which has been updated to be compatible with the new cache engine). Thanks for reporting !Best,
– Stephane
Stephane Dallongeville October 24, 2019 at 12:59 pmWe just updated the Intensity Projection plugin to improve the performance.
Still it remains a magnitude order slower than Icy < 2.0 version because we had to change the algorithm to make it compatible with the new virtual mode of Icy (which mean that you can compute intensity projection for a Z stack larger than your available memory).On my test image:
* Icy < 2.0 version was computing projection in 0.4 second
* previous Icy >= 2.0 version was computing projection in ~100 seconds (!!)
* new Icy >= 2.0 version computed projection in 4 secondsSo unfortunately it remains much slower than older versions but probably acceptable compared to what you had just before.
Best,
– Stephane
- This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Stephane Dallongeville.
IBPS CNRS-UPMC UMR7622 October 24, 2019 at 2:32 pmHi,
You are right I confirm, the same stack version 2.0.2 intensity plugin 1.63 running time =135 sec, version 1.9 plugin version 1.53 =12 sec, same conclusion as you did.
Thanks a lot.
Regards
Michel
The forum ‘Bug Reports’ is closed to new topics and replies.